Re: removal of the vacation package
Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> writes:
> Ansgar Burchardt <ansgar@debian.org> writes:
>> Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> writes:
>>> Is there such a beast with feature parity? vacation has a few nice
>>> defaults, like ignoring list mails and only sending one message per week
>>> to each receiver. Having every end user implement similar behaviour in
>>> sieve isn't likely to happen.
>>>
>>> The world has become a lot more stupid since vacation was written....
>>
>> The statement in the second paragraph is false.
>
> OK, then I got the wrong impression from the number of "out of office"
> messages I see on public mailing lists.
Yes. That might just be a larger sample size: your sample consists of
people who are subscribed to public mailing lists. This number depends
on time.
>> This also answers the first paragraph.
>
> Care to provide a pointer to an example?
RFC 5230, sections 4.2, 4.5, 4.6 and 8.
Ansgar
Reply to: