On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 11:04:05 +0100 Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.pro> wrote: > It is very sad to see that contributors sometimes feel that the only > option for them is to resign. > > Would it be worthwhile giving people another option, for example, > allowing a percentage of DDs to formally veto decisions? Would this > be better than people leaving outright? There are enough arguments already without that uncertainty. What does it mean if someone vetoes a GR? That just leads to anarchy. Decisions get made, some you agree with, some you don't. Some of the ones you disagree with can be accommodated and development moves on. If a binding decision is finally made, whether that be by a GR or a delegated team, there is no point allowing people to perpetuate the arguments long afterwards. There is enough scope for that already without making it formal. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
Attachment:
pgptcnMTJczvN.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature