On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:11:41AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > But Fedora, whose policies Richard Fontana helped to shape over the > years, considers OpenSSL to be a library covered by the system library > exception. But legal advice is not necessarily portable. As a project, we can certainly decide to start considering OpenSSL a system library, on the basis of legal advice. But to do so we should seek legal advice specifically targeted at the Debian case, and discuss the advice we get with the relevant stakeholders (e.g., the FSF, with whom we have pretty good connections these days). Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . zack@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o Former Debian Project Leader . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature