Bug#764969: ITP: djangorestframework-gis -- Geographic add-ons for Django REST Framework
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Fladischer <FladischerMichael@fladi.at>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
* Package name : djangorestframework-gis
Version : 0.7
Upstream Author : Douglas Meehan <dmeehan@gmail.com>
* URL : https://github.com/djangonauts/django-rest-framework-gis
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Geographic add-ons for Django REST Framework
djangorestframework-gis extends the Django REST Framework to also handle
geographic data as used by GeoDjango during serialization and deserialization.
It provides the following features:
..
* GeometryField: This field handles GeoDjango geometry fields, providing
custom to_native and from_native methods for GeoJSON input/output.
* GeoModelSerializer: This serializer updates the field_mapping dictionary to
include field mapping of GeoDjango geometry fields to the above
GeometryField.
* GeoFeatureModelSerializer: GeoFeatureModelSerializer is a subclass of
GeoModelSerializer which will output data in a format that is GeoJSON
compatible.
* InBBOXFilter: Filters a queryset to only those instances within a certain
bounding box.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=prqz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: