David Weinehall <tao@debian.org> (2014-09-30): > The latest upload of xbmc seems a bit botched; this is the > changelog in its entirety: > > > xbmc (2:13.2+dfsg1-2~exp0) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium > . > * > > Now, there is nothing wrong with terse and succinct changelogs, > but I'd say this is a bit *too* terse, and not at all succinct. > > Also, should the builders even accept packages that has an invalid > distribution specified (in the most recent changelog entry, that is)? > > Filtering out "UNRELEASED" and packages with an empty changelog would > prevent at least some premature uploads. What's in changelog doesn't actually matter; see changes file instead. You might be interested in things like this: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=542747 Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature