On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 12:58:04PM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Le vendredi, 12 septembre 2014, 13.55:53 Joey Hess a écrit : > > Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > > One thought... there will probably be trademark concerns with > > > "unix".[1] So we might have to choose a name for the tasksel task > > > to be someting like "unix-like". > > > > Or we could just call it "standard system". > > Could we make sure the full "vim" is in that then? I keep contemplating packaging ex-vi and advocating to replace vim-tiny with that. After all, the intent is to have something providing /usr/bin/vi, as one expects to have on a *nix system, so why not have it actually be vi? Then I could drop all the annoying packaging we had to add (and I have to maintain) to the vim packages, although it did help find some corner cases in handling of diversions, and stop getting annoyed at people complaining about vim-tiny. > I miss it on every > new installation and I'm quite sure that's not uncommon. Then install vim (or one of the other more featured binary packages) when you uninstall vim-tiny & nano. Just because the package is included as part of the install doesn't mean you have to use it. I'm sure there are plenty of people that remove vim-tiny and install some other non-vi(m) editor too. Cheers, -- James GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy <jamessan@debian.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature