Hi Eduard, On Donnerstag, 11. September 2014, Eduard Bloch wrote: > In fact, that is what I considered as workaround, and even harder: add a > debconf message with priority critical telling exactly those details. I (probably too briefly) skimmed though the bug report, but couldn't find a usecase where an encrypted filestem container with broken crypto could be useful. Could you elaborate, please? cheers, Holger, curious
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.