On Saturday 09 August 2014 18:46:09 Steve Langasek wrote: [snip] > Which according to elsewhere in my mailbox, you've dealt with by uploading a > 10-day delayed NMU. This is unacceptable. The NMU process always requires > that you send your NMU diff to the BTS for review by the maintainer > *first*. When doing a delayed NMU, it's reasonable to send this diff to the > BTS at the same time. Here, you have failed to send this NMU diff at all, > and the only notification has been an easily-overlooked mail from the > ftp-master queue software. > > Maintainers should not have to go grubbing around in the delayed queue to > find out what's been uploaded. The NMUer is responsible for sending the NMU > diff to the maintainer. > > I have removed pam_1.1.3-8.1_amd64.changes from the delayed queue. If you > have changes that you would like to see included in this package, please > send them to the BTS where they belong. Interesting, because yesterday I've got a patch  (cool, thanks a lot!) but stating that the package has been NMUed and uploaded to delayed/5. So, even 5 less days than in your case. Less than 5 minutes later, the package entered the archive . So, what am I supposed to do here? Doko: I *really* appreciate the fact that you sent a patch, but *please* respect your fellow DDs.  <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746907#12>  <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746907#19> -- Una sola bomba nuclear puede arruinar el resto de tu día. Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.