[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFH Packaging DNSSEC/TLSA Validator

Hey Ondřej,

* Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org> [2014-07-22 02:42:03 +0200]:

> I just found the upstream misses OpenSSL exception[1], so I will
> have to sort it out together with next stable upstream release.
> 1. Do we already have some nice *SSL boilerplate exception that
> would allow OpenSSL derivative libraries as well?

Joey Hess quoted the FSF boilerplate in [1]. In can be found in at least wget
and GnuPG. In full:

| In addition, as a special exception, <copyright holder> gives permission to
| link the code of <project> with the OpenSSL project's "OpenSSL" library (or
| with modified versions of it that use the same license as the "OpenSSL"
| library), and distribute the linked executables. You must obey the GNU General
| Public License in all respects for all of the code used other than "OpenSSL".
| If you modify this file, you may extend this exception to your version of the
| file, but you are not obligated to do so. If you do not wish to do so, delete
| this exception statement from your version.
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/07/msg00564.html

Nicolas Dandrimont

BOFH excuse #390:
Increased sunspot activity.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: