Re: possible MBF: automatically detecting unused build dependencies
op 07-07-14 14:20, Johannes Schauer schreef:
> sorry I attached two wrong files containing the many false positives already
> noticed by some of the replies. Here the actual results.
> cheers, josch
==> llvm-toolchain-3.4_3.4.1-4.arch-all.unusedbd.real <==
No, building with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=codecoverage enables at least some of them,
and applying patches might require the autotools to be re-run, so I think
lots of the requirements are sane.
doxygen is probably used for llvm-3.4-doc, so I think it might not be unused either.
texinfo probably the same.
diffutils, tcl, flex, patchutils, procps could possibly be unused, although not 100% sure. :-)