[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: what to do with wayland, python3, gdm3/systemd, ...



Am 28.04.2014 16:34, schrieb Felipe Sateler:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:44:39 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> 
>> you are not writing which packages you are talking about ...
>>
>> Am 28.04.2014 12:16, schrieb Osamu Aoki:
>>>  python3 support or not (Are we moving too?)
>>
>> bindings and python modules should be built for both Python2 and
>> Python3. If you cannot support both for some reason, please give Python3
>> the preference.
>>
>> There won't be any "move" to Python3, Python2 will still be in jessie,
>> but people should use Python3 in preference to Python2 if possible.
> 
> Today that is not really possible:
> 
> felipe@felipepc:tmp% aptitude search '^python3-' | wc -l 
> 836
> felipe@felipepc:tmp% aptitude search '^python-' | wc -l 
> 3144

sure, how many of the missing ones have upstream python3 support?

> Just a few weeks ago I decided run a python script for accessing the bts, 
> and discovered that you cannot (easily) do it on python3: none of 
> reportbug, debianbts or even soappy have python3 support.

Please file bug reports for these (maybe including patches).  I didn't check
soappy, but the others look like Debian upstream packages which should be ported.

I think these should be user-tagged/tracked with
python3/debian-python@lists.debian.org


Reply to: