control: retitle 739626 ITP: pt-websocket -- WebSocket pluggable transport On 20/02/14 17:00, David Fifield wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 03:58:02PM +0000, Ximin Luo wrote: >> - tor-pt-websocket or pt-websocket: These are unambigious but >> inconsistent with the other Tor pluggable transport in Debian, >> obfsproxy. And there is also "fteproxy" which will probably retain >> this naming when added to Debian in the future. > > I kind of like this option, with the idea that there will be more of > such in the future. > > websocket is a special case because the upstream package only has a > server (there is client code but just a toy that shouldn't be > installed). What will other packages that have a matched client and > server look like? People installing the client probably don't want to > install the server (and have their init.d messed with, etc.), and people > installing the server don't also need the client. > Lunar suggested pt-websocket since it is not intrinsically tied to Tor usage, so I will go with that. I think the longer name pt-websocket-server is unnecessary, since we are unlikely to ever release a pt-websocket-client, so I will stick pt-websocket. If anyone disagrees, please speak up soon, since I have all the packaging ready and just need to make some final tweaks before submitting it for sponsorship. X -- GPG: 4096R/1318EFAC5FBBDBCE git://github.com/infinity0/pubkeys.git
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature