Re: Having fun with the following C code (UB)

To: Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Having fun with the following C code (UB)
From: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 13:06:02 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] CA+7wUsyqVe9_qv3W8u9Eu_htogbScJ7GEhN5Zpf4g7ucYrCE=w@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CA+7wUsxcFAYzKJ-nTJviE_v5y_-2c9G79R4gL0GYEat0Db2E+w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] CA+7wUsxcFAYzKJ-nTJviE_v5y_-2c9G79R4gL0GYEat0Db2E+w@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org> wrote:
> Here is a little bug I just discovered:
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22664658/finding-off-t-size
>
> For reference, here are the packages affected in debian:
>
> http://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=LARGE_OFF_T

While this affects all autoconf based package in debian (limited to
32bits arch), I preferred not to mass bug everyone out there and
instead:

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742780

LFS is still a release goal, not a requirement.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Having fun with the following C code (UB)
  - From: Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@wrar.name>
- Re: Having fun with the following C code (UB)
  - From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>

References:
- Having fun with the following C code (UB)
  - From: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Having fun with the following C code (UB)
Next by Date: Re: Having fun with the following C code (UB)
Previous by thread: Having fun with the following C code (UB)
Next by thread: Re: Having fun with the following C code (UB)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread