Re: Conflicting package names
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 02:15:17AM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> I suggest not to spend any time on this. Mostly since the old
> conquest's upstream[0] isn't dead, unlike stated in #591487. This just
> might have changed in the meantime. But now, if ever anyone brings the
> old "conquest" back into Debian but you have taken the name in
> meantime, expect a lot of disturbance.
It was never dead. The Subject line of the bug suggests that the
reporter was very confused.
Reply to: