On Du, 23 mar 14, 17:03:00, brian m. carlson wrote: > On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 08:41:48AM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote: > > And while we are at it, do we *really* need the information about > > /bin/sh in at least a significant share of today's bug reports? > > You probably want it, because a decent number of people use a shell > other than bash or dash as /bin/sh. For example, one might use > mksh-static because it's statically linked. Also, someone might try to > use zsh as /bin/sh, which doesn't work (it breaks debconf). Wouldn't it make more sense to have that information conditionally, i.e. only if /bin/sh is *not* dash? Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic http://nuvreauspam.ro/gpg-transition.txt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature