Re: anonscm seems to be broken for SVN
On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 09:19:37PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2014-03-01 21:14, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Well, I actually do not really the difference. As far as I know both -
> > specifically anonscm which is verified by lintian - should work and it
> > does not.
>
> Verified is the wrong word here. Lintian operates with a blacklist and
> doesn't verify that URL works.
+1
My wording was a bit weak. I wanted to express that lintian tells me to
use anonscm.d.o in favour of svn.d.o. I hope the URLs will work soon
again since some services depend from anonscm.d.o.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: