Re: [Prepare mass bug filling][RFC] New lintian tags: privacy-breach

To: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [Prepare mass bug filling][RFC] New lintian tags: privacy-breach
From: cameron <camerontnorman@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 17:26:02 -0008
Message-id: <52b9c594.4a1d450a.6c12.71ee@mx.google.com>
In-reply-to: <20131224100335.GA10909@jwilk.net>
References: <CAE2SPAYdHddZfcwjhivz9XWiMh5eCCJ_2z9=0MnL-w4N3deMUg@mail.gmail.com> <20131224100335.GA10909@jwilk.net>

El Tue, 24 de Dec 2013 a las 2:03 AM, Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org> escribió:

* Bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bastien@gmail.com>, 2013-12-23, 16:23:
I have just implemented lintian-privacy-breach tags [1,2]
I don't think “privacy breach” is an appropriate _expression_ to use here. Can we find a less judgmental and more technical term?

Perhaps "phone home"?

Reply to:

References:
- [Prepare mass bug filling][RFC] New lintian tags: privacy-breach
  - From: Bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bastien@gmail.com>
- Re: [Prepare mass bug filling][RFC] New lintian tags: privacy-breach
  - From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#733045: debhelper: Can debhelper make autotools-dev updating default behaviour?
Next by Date: Re: GnuTLS in Debian
Previous by thread: Re: [Prepare mass bug filling][RFC] New lintian tags: privacy-breach
Next by thread: Re: [Prepare mass bug filling][RFC] New lintian tags: privacy-breach
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread