control: reopen -1 control: reassign -1 debian-policy thanks Hi Bas, On Montag, 9. Dezember 2013, Bas Wijnen wrote: > That doesn't make it an unreasonable expectation. I've seen the same > issue as well, and it always annoyed me. Why shouldn't we write this in > policy? "It must be possible to stop a service with its init script, > even if the package is disabled by its configuration files." I agree, thanks for refreshing my senses! Not that I think having this bug open or closed will change anything, but it was wrong to close it, thus it's right to reopen it. Oh, maybe it has changed something: now it has become a debatable bug in policy, thus reassigning it there. cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.