On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 22:40 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 22:01:48 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
>
> > It was Linus' decree that no new ABI is allowed to suffer from the Y2k38
> > bug even if its word size is 32 bit, and I'd say he's right. This means
> > that this problem will bite us the next time another 32 bit arch comes,
> > so there's no excuse to use this as an argument against x32.
> >
> And I'd say there's no excuse to introduce new 32bit archs, so I'm
> hoping there won't be a next time.
Brace yourself for arm32...
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Theory and practice are closer in theory than in practice.
- John Levine, moderator of comp.compilers
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part