On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 10:29:26PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > It seems that most reverse dependencies for iceweasel are l10n > packages and extensions, so that one can consider them as part > of the upgrade. The remaining dependencies seem to have a form > like iceweasel | www-browser. So, what would be wrong? That the extensions also need to be updated, for the very least. > Not also that in practice, many (most?) users will use a backport. > So, if some real reverse dependency would be affected by a change > in the iceweasel version, it rather needs to be fixed now. I presume most users of a backport don't use packaged extensions at all. > I mean the update of the package in testing. A RC bug is a way to > block transitions from happening there; a freeze is not needed. Multiple transitions then get entangled. Kind regards Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature