Hello, On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 23:23:45 +0000 "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> wrote: > I've seen a lot of cases over the years of packages depending on gawk > that do not need it. If you only need a standard nawk (new awk), you > do not need to depend on gawk. mawk is smaller and faster and > sufficient for almost all needs, and the existence of some awk on the > system is guaranteed by base-files. Well, as far as I know, mawk has some sort of terrible UTF-8 support, so it's a no way for many applications. -- WBR, Andrew
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature