Hi Felipe, On 12/18/2013 07:10 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 00:10:11 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > >> Hi Felipe, > > Hi Andreas, > >> >> I did not checked whether xbmc would be compliant to Debian Multimedia >> policy. My statement was written under the assumption that the package >> is following usual Debian standards which for sure contains the upstream >> source. If this is not the case what about asking Bálint to follow the >> Debian Multimedia policy when packaging xbmc and adopt the result of >> this. (In case I'm repeating something which was discussed before a >> link to this discussion.) > > I haven't really followed the discussion on this. XBMC was at some point > within the multimedia team, but for reasons I don't know it was moved > outside of it (I can't find any relevant discussion on my archives). > > Bálint (and any other people interested in XBMC), you are of course > welcome to join us at the Debian Multimedia team. Thank you for the invitation. I don't know the full story behind XBMC and the Multimedia Team, thus I would like to start maintaining it outside of the team, then when both upstream and the team is satisfied with XBMC's state in Debian I would happily join. I have created a git repository [1] under collab-maint for now. It still does not conform fully to Multimedia policy, but I tried to start the convergence. :-) Cheers, Balint [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/pkg-xbmc.git
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature