Re: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] procps with pidof is released
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 12:18:00PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> [sending this to both pkg-sysvinit-devel and debian-devel, instead of having
> two separate threads.]
Good idea.
It looks like you're talking here not about the sysvinit maintainers, but
> the *Red Hat* sysvinit maintainers. Perhaps the rewrite of pidof is
> something that we want to pick up, but the rationale for including it in the
> procps package doesn't apply to Debian at all.
Right, can someone go and ask the sysvinit-utils or sysvinit-tools
upstream what they are going to do? If they are going to keep pidof
then the change is not required. If the projects plans is to
retire/move it, then we will need to move it too.
I'm not sure exactly who the exact upstream project it is.
- Craig
--
Craig Small (@smallsees) http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org
GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5
Reply to: