Re: Arguments for tech-ctte
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Arguments for tech-ctte
- From: Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 21:18:00 -0800
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87li0ygnlj.fsf@vostro.rath.org>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20131108145437.626639f0@eunet.rs> (Marko Randjelovic's message of "Fri, 8 Nov 2013 14:54:37 +0100")
- References: <20131025122954.GA9101@bongo.bofh.it> <1382706410.21620.13.camel@heisenberg.scientia.net> <loom.20131025T155807-820@post.gmane.org> <20131025141920.GA6532@helios.pault.ag> <loom.20131025T162545-302@post.gmane.org> <20131025143147.GA7082@helios.pault.ag> <loom.20131025T170115-839@post.gmane.org> <CAKNHny8Ados9hiML4Rhgx4kfy_SpTcFZ_OGqeat4K+=v+BnPnA@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.BSM.4.64L.1310251641410.14370@herc.mirbsd.org> <1382721416.28704.38540481.685EF422@webmail.messagingengine.com> <Pine.BSM.4.64L.1310252200040.14370@herc.mirbsd.org> <[🔎] 20131108145437.626639f0@eunet.rs>
Marko Randjelovic <markoran@eunet.rs> writes:
> Additional arguments in favor of sysvinit:
[...]
Hi Marko,
The pro-sysvinit page on https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/initsystem
currently doesn't even a maintainer, and at least some members of the
tech committee have said that they'll make their decision mostly based
on the arguments presented there. So I think the best way to make your
case would be to work on
https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/initsystem/sysvinit.
Best,
Nikolaus
--
Encrypted emails preferred.
PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8 4EA2 E279 ABF6 02CF A9AD B7F8 AE4E 425C
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
Reply to: