Re: MIPS64EL port box is ready for use
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no> wrote:
> ]] Aron Xu
>
>> > IPMI would be lovely, but I'm not sure we can locate a board right now with
>> > that - so, we may have to fix remote management with a remotely controlled
>> > power/reset box - I believe they exist (something else I've been looking
>> > into). If the DSA already use some then I'd be interested to hear which :-)
>>
>> I don't know if IPMI is available, but there is certain kind of PCI
>> device that can help with remotely power on/off the machine controlled
>> by SMS. I'm curious if DSA think IPMI is mandatory for buildd and
>> porterbox.
>
> We would very much like «reasonable remote access». Whether that's IPMI
> onto a BMC or serial console which can interact with the boot loader and
> a network-enabled power strip is less important. Of course, having nice
> features like mounting of ISOs over HTTP and such is a nice bonus, but
> not a requirement.
>
> We haven't really talked about how and when it should be enforced, but
> I'm reluctant to take on more porter hardware that lacks reasonable
> remote management.
I thinlk we could hack a low cost arm like a cubiebox to do that. They
are plenty of gpio available and reseting power is only matter or
putting on/off a relay... Bonus point it will run debian :)
Bastien
> --
> Tollef Fog Heen (speaking on behalf of himself, but with a DSA hat)
> UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] m2fvrkf16y.fsf@rahvafeir.err.no">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] m2fvrkf16y.fsf@rahvafeir.err.no
>
Reply to: