Re: away_0.9.5+ds-0+nmu2_multi.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
On 25 October 2013 07:23, Rene Engelhard <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 01:18:18AM +0000, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
>> Changed-By: Andreas Moog <email@example.com
>> away (0.9.5+ds-0+nmu2) unstable; urgency=low
>> * Non-maintainer upload
>> - d/p/01_fix_makefile: $LIBS need to come after $SRC while linking to
>> fix building with ld --as-needed (Closes: #634323)
> A NMU for a MINOR bug is NOT something which should be done.
> I quietly accepted the dbs one, but this is over the line.
I sponsored Andreas' patch as NMU, on my own initiative.
> It builds fine. When some distro bogusly introduces changes which make
> all kind of packages breask they can fix them up; but this is not a reason
> for NMUing it in Debian.
You mean Debian right? Cause --as-needed is a linker flag available in
Debian's default toolchain and there is a lot of ongoing work done to
enable it by default.
Bogus or not, it's an upstream linker option which reduces amount of
linked libraries, and overwhelming majority of well behaved packages
do build with --as-needed in ever increasing amount of distributions,
e.g. OpenSuse, Fedora, etc. It's not default in Debian toolchain, but
there are no good reasons why it shouldn't be. I understand that
"away" package did not even handle CFLAGS, CPPFLAGS, LDFLAGS, and
DESTDIR until last nmu, but why not improve a package or at least
reply to the bug report?