Re: let's split the systemd binary package [Was, Re: systemd effectively mandatory now due to GNOME]
On 10/24/2013 10:45 AM, Uoti Urpala wrote:
> I think you'd basically need a completely separate logind
> package for non-systemd systems.
>
> And if you think this is work that "must be done", then it is YOUR
> responsibility to do it. It's not the systemd maintainers'
> responsibility to implement new functionality for non-systemd systems.
Though it's systemd (and Gnome) maintainers responsibility to have their
package integrate well with the rest of the distribution.
Thomas
Reply to: