Re: Bits from the Release Team (Jessie freeze info)
- To: debian-devel <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Bits from the Release Team (Jessie freeze info)
- From: Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de>
- Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 19:41:15 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 525ADB3B.20103@bzed.de>
- In-reply-to: <20131013150131.BBDEB2000C2F8@thykier.net>
- References: <20131013150131.BBDEB2000C2F8@thykier.net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
> We are happy to announce that we will freeze Jessie at 23:59 UTC on the 5th
> of November 2014.
thanks for annoucing that early and for your work!
> [...] * Proactive automated removals 3 months into the freeze. - Note that
> bug-free packages will be removed if they (build-)depend on a RC-buggy,
> non-key package.
Could we get a warning about such removals before they are scheduled? Like at
least one week before? Having an eye on all packages all my packages
build-depend is something which would be great to avoid ;)
> [...]
> - Native packages are at a disadvantage here, since all uploads of native
> packages are considered a new "upstream" version.
So whats the "fix" for that? Migrating native packages to non-native ones does
not always make sense.
> [...] - It should also go without saying that embedding a new upstream
> release in a patch just to get a such "carte blanche" exception is also
> considered abuse.
What about bugfix point-releases from upstream, like postgres and other sane
upstreams do it?
thanks & cheers,
Bernd
- --
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org
GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/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=dV3F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: