Re: Bug#688251: #688251: Built-Using description too aggressive
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I paste below the current wording in the Policy 3.9.4. If you have an
> improvement to propose, that would be much appreciated !
The wording doesn't appear confusing to me so I'm not the best person
to propose wording changes.
> The problem to solve here is to find a clear and concise way to describe how
> this field is used. The current description in the Policy has confused some
> people and made them think or worry that they were asked unreasonable work.
I would suggest leaving the current wording, monitoring usage of the
field and filing bugs on any packages that use the field in an