Re: Call for Jessie Release Goals
- To: Debian Release <email@example.com>
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: Call for Jessie Release Goals
- From: Mathieu Malaterre <email@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 10:42:13 +0200
- Message-id: <CA+7wUswH4jbsGyU87g1e7d7QC=29-TQ-q8PdAWtUga2Dgi1CEw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <20130911191702.GB7772@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
- References: <20130911191702.GB7772@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Release goals are areas of functionality which developers would like to see
> as an aim for the next release. They will not hold up the release, but
> allow the bugs opened for that goal to be of severity 'important'.
I am not sure if this qualify as "Release goals". So I'd like to ask
first what people think of using C++11 in the next release.
I know of a couple of C++ libraries which could be compiled with the
new gcc compilation option. And I have at least one application (no
shared lib) which requires C++11 to compile properly. Since C++11
introduce an ABI incompatibility [*], this may not be a Release Goal
but simply a tech-ctte decision.