Communication issue? (was: Consciously blocking packages and development)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Le 03/09/2013 02:10, Norbert Preining a écrit :
> Are you planning to block TeX Live transition for unforeseeable future?
Absolutely not, a fixed d-e-d package will be uploaded in due time. In
the mean time, if you’re in a hurry to see your package reach testing,
feel free to provide back the binary packages you removed (via
convenient dummy transitional packages) instead of breaking any third
party due to their uncoordinated disappearance.
Thanks in advance for considering.
> It is ridiculous that you not even care for *answering*
Apologies about that, it has never been anyone’s intention to ignore
this issue. On the contrary, we even staged a fix a few hours after
Ansgar filled this bug (thank you by the way for the bug and the hint):
P.-S.: transitional packages could be a way to document such disruptive
change, but a note in changelog would have been appreciated.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----