[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Communication issue? (was: Consciously blocking packages and development)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi Norbert,

Le 03/09/2013 02:10, Norbert Preining a écrit :

> Are you planning to block TeX Live transition for unforeseeable future?

Absolutely not, a fixed d-e-d package will be uploaded in due time. In
the mean time, if you’re in a hurry to see your package reach testing,
feel free to provide back the binary packages you removed (via
convenient dummy transitional packages) instead of breaking any third
party due to their uncoordinated disappearance.

Thanks in advance for considering.

> It is ridiculous that you not even care for *answering*

Apologies about that, it has never been anyone’s intention to ignore
this issue. On the contrary, we even staged a fix a few hours after
Ansgar filled this bug (thank you by the way for the bug and the hint):

http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-edu/debian-edu-doc.git;a=commitdiff;h=7bc2cb76d3369b457bd8c691bab2dbb9885b0708

Regards

David

P.-S.: transitional packages could be a way to document such disruptive
change, but a note in changelog would have been appreciated.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJSJYo/AAoJEAWMHPlE9r08JvwH/1hZLihgzo+Pzyqmd8oeRtgc
ur+TG1Ypkkv+u9RV5SrY5omXp7CAwE3owzlIcbDhRTFUfzqStQfEbUjV/kZeMKWl
YmhpD+VflFhPRES/Gs4gzZKp8Q17KCKPTh4EMCWMm/ftB5Cmdf7RsPsfCWx6cdK3
JbLIQsi3smm9cCodYvvla+Sr2jvInMA40UL8xB5oFmE7znWIIfL+KEaow+yCj/4P
ofMIQFQrPJLMI37BWakGZbX25muWYPvd1/hmezbG0AoIENF9FoQytoa4hEDVN27v
FjSR+ipjgxjjap25aQm2lMzqxUEIa1QUdThr1CGokiPCGy5F1z0QgVY8D+PReaQ=
=sMfd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: