[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: DFSG claims BSD, not BSD 2/3-clause, is DFSG-free

* Richard Hartmann:

> Something that _can_ easily be changed (afaik) is that the DFSG[1] states that
>   'The GPL, BSD, and Artistic licenses are examples of licenses that
> we consider free.'
> It's quite obvious that this refers to 2- and 3- clause BSD, not
> 4-clause BSD.

The "BSD" hyperlink in the quote above used to refer to the text of
the 4-clause version.

Reply to: