Re: DFSG claims BSD, not BSD 2/3-clause, is DFSG-free
Richard Hartmann <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Something that _can_ easily be changed (afaik) is that the DFSG
> states that
> 'The GPL, BSD, and Artistic licenses are examples of licenses that
> we consider free.'
> It's quite obvious that this refers to 2- and 3- clause BSD, not
> 4-clause BSD.
The 4-clause BSD license is also DFSG-free. We have a bunch of 4-clause
BSD licensed software in the archive.
Russ Allbery (email@example.com) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>