On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 09:35 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 09:15:15AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > > Again, why do you plan on removing free software from main due to a > > change in license? > > As algernon points out, it makes slightly more sense when you remember > that the AGPLv3 is not compatable with the GPLv2 > > I'm still against removing it from the archive. But the new version should not build the default libdb-dev, as that is likely to result in unintended GPLv2/v3 combinations that cannot be distributed. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Life would be so much easier if we could look at the source code.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part