On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 13:10:24 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > this I'd probably file as serious, not having checksums for files in /usr > seems worse. But then, the same reasoning as for the above bugs applies, so > maybe important is better after all. > There's no requirement for md5sums files in the first place AFAIK. How are incomplete md5sums worse than no md5sums? If anything this stuff should be minor IMO. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature