Quoting Andreas Tille (2013-01-11 13:36:19) > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 08:39:41PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > Not any more (hopefully) since I droped the `find -name` approach > > > which turned out as insufficient (even if very attractive in the > > > first place). > > In that case, the field in mothur's copyright file (and perhaps > > others) is not valid, as it uses [] wildcards, which are not > > recognized in Files fields. > > Uhmmm, I was not aware of this. Hmmm, this needs to be discussed. > Any specific reason not to support [] wildcards? Without having dived > deeply into this I'd consider this as an unneeded restriction. Needed or not, it is how the format looks now. Please avoid derailing into _development_ of the format. Regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature