On Friday, October 12, 2012 05:10:12 David Kalnischkies wrote: > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer > > <calestyo@scientia.net> wrote: > > algo,... not to mention that newer algos like Keccack are quite fast. > > I wonder if it is really a good idea to search for a security checksum > based on the metric that it can be quickly calculated … but off-topic. FWIW, NIST disagrees. Keccack is SHA-3: <http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/ST/hash/sha-3/winner_sha-3.html>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.