On 10/08/2012 08:04, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 01:16:17AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: >> Wasn't the idea of porting to non-Linux rejected by upstart's upstream? > > Porting upstart to non-Linux kernels has never been rejected by upstream. > It just requires porters to do the porting; no one involved in upstart > upstream has any applicable BSD or Hurd porting experience. > If I recall correctly, non-Linux ports were required by upstream to be maintained in a separate bzr branch, because upstart's upstream did not want compatibility code inside the main code-base. This sounds very much like "if you want to port it, fork it." -- Kind regards, Loong Jin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature