Re: Moving /tmp to tmpfs makes it useful
On 05/26/2012 04:40 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 03:24:02AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
>>> /tmp 8,0G 60M 8,0G 1% /tmp
>>> Does this count as "large files"?
>>> As "a lot of small-only files"?
>>>
>>>
>> Exactly how is this a practical explanation and example? :/
>> Are you saying that in *your case* /tmp is almost unused?
>>
> I'm saying that 60M is a substantial amount which still may be not called
> "large".
>
Try playing a 2h video with flash, and see that 60 MB isn't enough...
Thomas
Reply to: