Re: removal of Qt3

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: removal of Qt3
From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 15:09:44 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] CAKTje6Eo8VHiukuziiON90MCefK3=MZx2OygArm7pty2BkSd7g@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20120521073624.b6bb2238a12a8a99fed0182b@debian.org>
References: <[🔎] 20120520165820.GA16145@pryan.ekaia.org> <[🔎] CAKTje6FvUmL_4B8CB7f2LB2hKrx_w0CDn=-VvWhzHASdDMBnwQ@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20120521073624.b6bb2238a12a8a99fed0182b@debian.org>

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Neil Williams wrote:

> Does LSB matter?

LSB is irrelevant to me personally since I'm mostly not interested in
running proprietary software on Linux systems.

I guess LSB must be relevant to Debian since we have it in Debian and
even have a mailing list dedicated to it:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-lsb/

Apparently LSB 5.0 will drop the Qt3 requirement:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-lsb/2012/02/msg00009.html

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: removal of Qt3
  - From: Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de>

References:
- removal of Qt3
  - From: Ana Guerrero <ana@debian.org>
- Re: removal of Qt3
  - From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
- Re: removal of Qt3
  - From: Neil Williams <codehelp@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: amd64 as default architecture
Next by Date: Re: debuild/dpkg-buildpackage behaves not as expected
Previous by thread: Re: removal of Qt3
Next by thread: Re: removal of Qt3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread