Re: Bug#668556: ITP: dparser -- a scannerless GLR parser generator
On 04/14/2012 01:12 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> I can't really imagine someone writing a parser using such tools without
> having heard these acronyms first, though. And I'd risk saying they are
> actually more widely known than their expansions.
Yeah, that's why I think the acronyms must be included in the long
description as well. But it cannot hurt to provide the expansion. At
best, it might even increase the number of people who actually know what
the acronyms stand for (Although I - for example - am not sure I'm able
to remember the GLR one...). ;-)
Regards
Markus Wanner
Reply to: