On Apr 09, Roger Leigh <rleigh@codelibre.net> wrote:
> majority, it's going to be increasingly untested. Do we want to
> continue to maintain something that will be increasingly
> unsupportable, or complete the migration cleanly before that point?
Kill it. With fire.
> WRT actually doing this, the main issues I can see are
I say just abort the upgrade and let root deal with the issues found,
it's better than risking clobbering some local change.
> - blocking by obsolete-but-unpurged init scripts without LSB header.
> We could mv them out of the way to .dpkg-old and continue, or
> abort and require manual intervention.
Or just say in the release notes that it's a good idea to run something
like this before upgrading:
dpkg -l | awk '/^rc/ {print $2}' | xargs --no-run-if-empty dpkg --purge
> This can, of course, be left until wheezy+1. It's just something
Why wait?
--
ciao,
Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature