On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 22:11 +0000, Roger Leigh wrote: > There are 19 packages still using /dev/.udev after udev transitioned > to /run/udev. Unless there are any objections, I'd like to raise the > severity of these bugs from important to serious, given that the /run > migration is a release goal. Release goals aren't release critical by definition, so that would be inappropriate. Regards, Adam