[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#696979: ITP: pamtester -- utility program to test the PAM facility



Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

* Package name    : pamtester
  Version         : 0.1.2
  Upstream Author : Moriyoshi Koizumi <moriyoshi@users.sourceforge.net>
* URL             : http://pamtester.sourceforge.net/
* License         : BSD
  Programming Lang: C
  Description     : utility program to test the PAM facility

Pamtester is a tiny utility program to test the pluggable authentication
modules (PAM) facility, which is a de facto standard of unified
authentication management mechanism in many unices and similar OSes
including Solaris, HP-UX, *BSD, MacOSX and Linux.
..
While specifically designed to help PAM module authors to test their
modules, that might also be handy for system administrators interested
in building a centralised authentication system using common standards
such as NIS, SASL and LDAP.

Some notes:
 - I know that the last upstream version was released back in 2005, so
   it's quite old. I think it might be a helpful utility for PAM
   tests.

 - Fedora/RedHat included pamtester too some time ago[1].

 [1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730815

 - In Debian there is at leat python-pam, which brings an example,
   doing something similar. But it seems upstream project is not
   reachable anymore (e.g. there should be a 0.5.0 release, but
   webpage is dead).
 
Regards,
Salvatore

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=7wzG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: