Re: Canonical pushes upstart into user session - systemd developer complains
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Canonical pushes upstart into user session - systemd developer complains
- From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 10:16:54 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20121201091654.GO23005@grep.be>
- In-reply-to: <20121130011804.GO5527@xvii.vinc17.org>
- References: <20121124184307.GD29683@rep.kiev.ua> <20121125094827.GI9596@tal> <20121125100359.GA11600@physik.fu-berlin.de> <20121125150623.GA8154@khazad-dum.debian.net> <20121125222708.GE411@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <20121126160014.GH1246@xvii.vinc17.org> <20121129144635.GD383@grep.be> <20121129152303.GH5527@xvii.vinc17.org> <CAFoWM=_wgJpUuekJ+g23X--G3NjFFpjWmyBOTK+E_-wTYrMYGQ@mail.gmail.com> <20121130011804.GO5527@xvii.vinc17.org>
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 02:18:04AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2012-11-29 08:37:19 -0800, Kelly Clowers wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> wrote:
> > > And interfaces in various programming languages?
> >
> > http://search.cpan.org/~shlomif/Config-IniFiles-2.78/lib/Config/IniFiles.pm
>
> At least for Perl, I can't see anything related to validation.
That's because validating an ini file is trivially easy:
the line is a comment line, which must start with a # after optional
whitespace,
or it is a section header, where all data must be surrounded by [],
or it is a key-value pair, where the key must be one word and be
separated by the value by a =
or it is invalid.
There, validation.
To validate an XML file, much more is involved, including checks of
nested tags and escaped characters.
> BTW, how do you do nested blocks in .ini files?
You can't, and that's a feature. Instead, you have keys where the value
is the name of another section (or possibly another ini file) containing
the "nested" data.
Anyway, this is fairly off-topic for -devel, so EOT for me.
--
Copyshops should do vouchers. So that next time some bureaucracy requires you
to mail a form in triplicate, you can mail it just once, add a voucher, and
save on postage.
Reply to: