[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2012-10-30)



Hello List,

does it make sense to establish a list of candidates for reintroduction to testing ?

I have in mind packages that were discarded too quickly because
an easy to fix a RC appeared a some point while it was unofficially orphaned.

Jerome

On 30/10/12 14:32, Niels Thykier wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi,

We are considering removing the following packages from testing as
they have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. The packages can be
found in the attached dd-list.  The bugs that put them on this list
can be found in the removals file (also attached) just above the
package name.  We have BCC'ed this email to<pkg>@packages.debian.org
for the relevant packages.

The packages have been selected based on the following criteria:
  * The package had at least one RC bug without activity for the past
    14 days.
  * If a bug is assigned to multiple packages, both packages will be
    affected.
  * The RC bug affects both unstable and testing.
  * The affected package does not have any reverse dependencies in
    testing.

If the relevant RC bugs in the affected packages are not dealt with
/before/ Wednesday the 7th of Nov.[1], the packages will be removed
from testing.  Note that "dealt with" may also include downgrading a
severity-inflated bug or fixing affected versions in the BTS.

Please remember to file unblock bugs for packages fixed via uploads to
unstable (and tpu bugs for requests to fix the package via a tpu
upload).

Should you need a bit more time than given, please do not hesitate to
contact us.  It is also easier for us if we can avoid having to
reintroduce a removed package.

We will check the DELAYED queues before activing the removal hints, so
NMUs in the DELAYED queues will be given a chance to reach unstable.

Thanks,
Niels (on behalf of the Release Team)

The bugs were found using the tools from:
   svn://svn.debian.org/svn/collab-qa/rc-buggy-leaf-packages


http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html


[1] We intend to do the removal with the 10:00 UTC run of Britney of
that day.


  --8<-- dd-list --8<--
Aurélien GÉRÔME<ag@roxor.cx>
    dancer-ircd

Al Stone<ahs3@debian.org>
    lmbench

Chris Lamb<lamby@debian.org>
    python-django-extensions

Debian PHP Maintainers<pkg-php-maint@lists.alioth.debian.org>
    xcache (U)

Debian XMPP Maintainers<pkg-xmpp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
    jabber-muc

Ghe Rivero<ghe.rivero@stackops.com>
    quantum (U)

Jesus Climent<jesus.climent@hispalinux.es>
    distmp3

Jorge Salamero Sanz<bencer@debian.org>
    jabber-muc (U)

Jose Luis Tallon<jltallon@adv-solutions.net>
    couriergraph

Julien Danjou<acid@debian.org>
    quantum (U)

Kai Storbeck<kai@xs4all.nl>
    roundup

Loic Dachary (OuoU)<loic@debian.org>
    quantum (U)

Ludovic Brenta<lbrenta@debian.org>
    polyorb (U)

Martin Loschwitz<madkiss@debian.org>
    ircd-ircu

Mehdi Abaakouk<sileht@sileht.net>
    quantum (U)

Michal ÄŒihaÅ™<nijel@debian.org>
    xcache

Mike Markley<mike@markley.org>
    dk-milter

Peter Krefting<peterk@debian.org>
    lyskom-server

PKG OpenStack<openstack-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
    quantum

Thomas Goirand<zigo@debian.org>
    quantum (U)

Toni Mueller<toni@debian.org>
    roundup (U)

Xavier Grave<xavier.grave@ipno.in2p3.fr>
    polyorb
  --8<-- end of dd-list --8<--

  --8<-- removals.txt --8<--
# #689884
remove couriergraph/0.25-4.1

# #689886
remove dancer-ircd/1.0.36-8

# #689887
remove distmp3/0.1.9.ds1-4.4

# #689888
remove dk-milter/1.0.0.dfsg-1.2

# #689893
remove ircd-ircu/2.10.12.10.dfsg1-1

# #689894
remove jabber-muc/0.8-3

# #689897
remove lmbench/3.0-a9-1

# #689898
remove lyskom-server/2.1.2-12

# #688299
remove polyorb/2.8~20110207-4

# #690425
remove python-django-extensions/0.6+git201107051902-1

# #685251
remove quantum/2012.1-5

# #689257
remove roundup/1.4.20-1

# #690409
remove xcache/2.0.0-2

  --8<-- end of removals.txt --8<--
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=4EtK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Reply to: