[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Hijacking^W^W^W^W^W^WSalvaging packages for fun and profit: A proposal

On Thursday, October 11, 2012 06:44:53 PM Charles Plessy wrote:
>  - I am not found of the voting procedure, and would rather propose to
> follow a similar process as for the modification of the Policy and the
> Developers Reference, where at least three DDs need to indicate that, in
> their conclusion, a consensus has been reached.  I think that if a package
> is orphaned with for instance a 16:3 majority, it indicates a problem
> rather than a consensus.  Also if the maintainer opposes, this shows lack
> of consensus and a vote can only aggravate the situation.

I am also concerned with this.  I think it should either be unanimous or there 
is a dispute the tech ctte should resolve.  I don't think we should introduce 
voting on the quality of other DD's package maintenance.

Scott K

Reply to: