Re: Hijacking^W^W^W^W^W^WSalvaging packages for fun and profit: A proposal
On Thursday, October 11, 2012 06:44:53 PM Charles Plessy wrote:
> - I am not found of the voting procedure, and would rather propose to
> follow a similar process as for the modification of the Policy and the
> Developers Reference, where at least three DDs need to indicate that, in
> their conclusion, a consensus has been reached. I think that if a package
> is orphaned with for instance a 16:3 majority, it indicates a problem
> rather than a consensus. Also if the maintainer opposes, this shows lack
> of consensus and a vote can only aggravate the situation.
I am also concerned with this. I think it should either be unanimous or there
is a dispute the tech ctte should resolve. I don't think we should introduce
voting on the quality of other DD's package maintenance.