On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 15:05:21 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 02:43:47PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > > But I see the use case, e.g. for packages that rebuild the > > documentation if some tool is available and just skip it gracefully > > and use the shipped version, if not. > How do you make sure that the uploaded packages are reproducible? That's the problem I was alluding to in the paragraph before. (In the case of docs the build result will probably not be identical anyway, in the typical case where timestamps or tool versions are included.) Please note that I'm not proposing to go that way; I just wanted to state that I understand the question of the original poster because I've thought about something similar before. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: The Eagles: Take It To The Limit
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature