Hi Andrey et al. On Mo 23 Jul 2012 14:34:58 CEST Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 02:29:23PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:It would probably make sense to rename the console executable (as provided by upstream) to cream-terminal then?Of course (and poke upstream to do that, not just rename it in the package).Or will Debian accept an binary with the name of console in /usr/bin?I was going to answer "of course no" but then I've found /usr/bin/console in conserver-client package. That's a bad idea anyway.
The package has been retitled to ,,cream-terminal'' (I might have forgotten to Cc: d-d ML for that, sorry), I encourage upstream to rename the binary (and maybe the upstream project), as well.
OT: Same with melange -> cream-melange (though melange as binary name is not in use...).
Greets, Mike -- DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, rothenstein 5, 24214 neudorf-bornstein fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148 GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31 mail: firstname.lastname@example.org, http://das-netzwerkteam.de freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb
Description: Digitale PGP-Unterschrift