[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Sysklogd vs. rsyslog



On 07.07.2012 19:07, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-07-07 at 19:40:25 +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
>> Recent issue is that new kernels (3.5-rc?) have a problem with sysklogd.
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=134161256014626&w=2
>> Maybe someone can reply there if having knowledge.
>> In same thread Linus made another harsh reply that I don't quote here:
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=134160685712793&w=2
> 
> This would be due to:
> 
>   <http://lists.debian.org/debian-derivatives/2011/04/msg00037.html>
> 
> for which I did a review that got ignored:
> 
>   <http://lists.debian.org/debian-derivatives/2011/05/msg00003.html>
> 

Is sysklogd still actively maintained upstream/in Debian?
Doesn't look like it from a cursory glance.

Maybe the package should be O/RFAed or completely retired if no one is
found to take care of it.

Michael


-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: