[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Sysklogd vs. rsyslog

On 07.07.2012 19:07, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-07-07 at 19:40:25 +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
>> Recent issue is that new kernels (3.5-rc?) have a problem with sysklogd.
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=134161256014626&w=2
>> Maybe someone can reply there if having knowledge.
>> In same thread Linus made another harsh reply that I don't quote here:
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=134160685712793&w=2
> This would be due to:
>   <http://lists.debian.org/debian-derivatives/2011/04/msg00037.html>
> for which I did a review that got ignored:
>   <http://lists.debian.org/debian-derivatives/2011/05/msg00003.html>

Is sysklogd still actively maintained upstream/in Debian?
Doesn't look like it from a cursory glance.

Maybe the package should be O/RFAed or completely retired if no one is
found to take care of it.


Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to: